From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3781228296a8f7b1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: re: GNAT probem (should have been on chat@gnat)
Date: 1999/10/12
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.991012125455.86594F-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 535764542
Referen: 
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.991010120243.40882A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il
X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 939726217 12547 132.64.178.45 (12 Oct 1999 11:03:37
 GMT)
Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Oct 1999 11:03:37 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-10-12T11:03:37+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I'd venture a gues about my problem.

I think it was the result of an elaboration order problem. I didn't see
any discussion of this in the docs, but I don't see any reason why the
result of gnatmake -f will produce the same elab order as a gnatmake with
no -f. So perhpas this is the cause. I added a pragma...

Wheter this really solved the problem the original problem I don't know
(since the code is evolving rapidly) but I guess I will use -gnatwl next
time I have a similiar problem.

By the way: I really enjoyed the output of gnatbind -e. Is it a feature or
a bug that it goes to stderr (only the header goes to stdout)? I caught it
with >& in DOS. (GNAT3.11)

Nice tool

Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web 
Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!