From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c703c7ba8401cbb6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: signatures
Date: 1999/07/29
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990729214156.212760A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 506685310
Organization: The hebrew University of Jerusalem
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Suppose I want to ensure that a to be written set of routines all
conform to a given signatre (let's say all sort routines have the
signature 
generic
   type item is private;
   type list is array(positive range <>) of item; 
procedure sort (s:in out list);
)?

What is the preffered way of doing this?

Ehud Lamm     mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm  <== My home on the web