From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d0b383ee17c13af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: One type for all
Date: 1999/07/10
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990710013813.72936A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 499279861
References: <3783E0D2.5D74243@boeing.com> <3786741C.E73F1124@hso.link.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: The hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-07-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Samuel T. Harris wrote:

> Types in both Ada 83 and Ada 95 use name-equivalence instead
> of structural-equivalence 

Note that when you instantiate a generic a strucutural equivalence is
required (according to the generic rules).

Ehud Lamm     mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm  <== My home on the web