From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bcdac28207102750
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ehud Lamm <mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Ada95 speed
Date: 1999/06/05
Message-ID: 
 <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.990605195613.97366A-100000@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 486065366
References: <7jafeo$6ps@lotho.delphi.com> <7jb2b4$6eq$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Organization: The hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-06-05T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, Robert Dewar wrote:

> 
> But in the old days, I often saw people write absolutely
> appalling assembly language, so there is no immunity here from
> incompetence :-)
> 
I reacll reading somewhere a quote from Sir Clive Sinclair to the effect
that as computers grow faster programmers bacmae lass and less
professional, and stopped being aware of how things really work.

Ehud Lamm     mslamm@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il
http://www2.cybericites.com/e/ehud