From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,453ed54f02292eea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ehud Lamm Subject: Re: Simple Ada question Date: 2000/05/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 625885938 References: <8f8fm5$de5$1@news.uit.no> <3923B647.82A765D4@bton.ac.uk> <8g8q19$amd$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <392934E9.FA87156E@bton.ac.uk> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 959009224 24871 132.64.178.45 (22 May 2000 15:27:04 GMT) Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 May 2000 15:27:04 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-22T15:27:04+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 22 May 2000, John English wrote: |Ehud Lamm wrote: |> |> Actually a student came to me saying "I found a compiler bug" it says that |> i is not referenced, where as I clearly use it in the for loop.... | |Which is why I think a more explicit warning might be a good thing: |"loop index uses the same name as an existing object" or something |like that (although I'm sure the wording could be improved...) since |this is nearly always an indication of an error where the writer |believes that the two names will refer to the same thing. | I agree. That's why I gave this example. On the other hand, learning to understand compiler messages is also important. Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!