From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,789b1b7142e884ff X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ehud Lamm Subject: Re: not really an Ada question Date: 2000/02/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 586826299 References: <88d88d$hnp$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 950708939 13700 132.64.178.45 (16 Feb 2000 13:48:59 GMT) Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Feb 2000 13:48:59 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-16T13:48:59+00:00 List-Id: On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Ehud Lamm wrote: |On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Robert Dewar wrote: | ||Why doesn't GNAT.OS_Lib.Spawn do the job (don't overlook the ||stuff in GNAT.*, there is useful stuff there :-) || | |funny. I am a great fan of the GNAT.* packages. Strange I didn't think of |checking there this time! I will, now! Well I tried using non_Blocking_Spawn - as this seems the thing I want, right? I want the next spawn to work in such a way that the two programs will work side by side. Well this is not what happens. To be concrete: the program I execute is a simple prgram create using GNAT, toom that loops printing a word to the screen and delaying. I am pretty sure the issue here is how Windows works, not Ada - but any clue will be recieved gratefully. Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!