From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fa2cc518ef3b992c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ehud Lamm Subject: Re: scripting/extension language for Ada (was : Re: tagged types extensions) Date: 2000/02/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 582228573 References: <389207CC.C16D80E8@averstar.com> <38971028.BB16D8A2@earthlink.net> <3899F757.FAE131B3@free.fr> <389D43A6.786C7B79@free.fr> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 949837342 22072 132.64.178.45 (6 Feb 2000 11:42:22 GMT) Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Feb 2000 11:42:22 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-02-06T11:42:22+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, Lionel Draghi wrote: |As Robert A Duff said : |"Scripting languages should encourage programs that are easy to |write, easy to understand, and easy to change." This seems like a good goal for all kinds of languages... | |> So I wouldn't go in the direction of an Ada or Ada-like scripiting |> language, but rather in one or both of these directions: |> - packages that supply functionality useflu for scripting jobs. |> - embeddable little languages that can be usedfrom inside Ada systems. |With the former available for the later, i suppose? Or the other way arround... Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!