From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a6fe6b4d76b6246 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ehud Lamm Subject: Re: Dummy Date: 2000/01/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 571161804 References: <387b166a.3821486@newsread.albacom.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 947595668 23541 132.64.178.45 (11 Jan 2000 13:01:08 GMT) Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jan 2000 13:01:08 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-11T13:01:08+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Simic_10111 wrote: |has Ada anything to do with OOP? Yep. Ada has the facilites for industrial strength OO. There are many source covering this. I myself prefer the Ada95 Rational (see on Adapower) II.4. |is Ada conceptually easy and intuitive? This depends. It is in the eyes of the beholder. But one thing that makes Ada a favorite is the emphaisze of writing code that is readable. This makes it easier to learn the language (from examples etc.) Of course, that deep dehind the covers Ada has all the machinary needed for a full-blown, robust language. But for a programmer, not interested in these details, the syntax is pretty straight forward (esp. if you are faimiliar with Pascal etc.) |is Ada an imperative language? Yes. |d'ye have any tutorial (apart Lovelace) or ebook for me to study? Check www.adapower.com for links. Also see my site. I do not know of any useful complete ebook on Ada. Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!