From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4fe319e8a983326a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ehud Lamm Subject: Re: Ada & C Date: 2000/01/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 570483061 References: <3878D189.80E1CCB4@gte.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.huji.ac.il X-Trace: news.huji.ac.il 947451295 15211 132.64.178.45 (9 Jan 2000 20:54:55 GMT) Organization: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jan 2000 20:54:55 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-09T20:54:55+00:00 List-Id: I am not sure I understand from the quoted part in Brian's answer your exact position (I am experiencing failures in news propagation here, so I will not wait until the original answer floats this way). What's your level of experience with C++ and OOP idioms? If these can be problematic, than you'd better concentrate your efforts on these. What I'd do is read Stroustrup on C++ (still my favorite), the GOF design patterns book (the example are in C++, and the patterns themselves an essential part of OOP vocabulary). [Links to patterns on my web page] "Effective C++" from Scott Meyers, can also prove useful. Finally, I guess it goes without saying that the place to get answers on these topics is comp.lang.c/c++.* ;-) Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== My home on the web Check it out and subscribe to the E-List- for interesting essays and more!