From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd173879a595bde
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!skynet.be!newsfeed1.funet.fi!newsfeeds.funet.fi!nntp.inet.fi!central1.inet.fi!inet.fi!read3.inet.fi.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: Lauri Ora <lauri.ora@iki.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Default rep specs for record types - documented??
References: <slrndmloee.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org>
 <meKdnXXIJd6tVPfeRVn-vw@comcast.com>
 <slrndmlus8.kq0.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org> <uacgktuhd.fsf@acm.org>
 <uy844sci9.fsf@acm.org>
 <1131118073.282094.236790@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
 <slrndmn0ub.v5k.lauri@dev.diter.com>
 <slrndmod4h.b6j.bogus_addy@tango.mindfuq.org> <op.szqzwuei5afhvo@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <op.szqzwuei5afhvo@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <PdWaf.14$EM5.10@read3.inet.fi>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 04:07:11 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.223.245.232
X-Complaints-To: abuse@inet.fi
X-Trace: read3.inet.fi 1131163631 80.223.245.232 (Sat,
 05 Nov 2005 06:07:11 EET)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:07:11 EET
Organization: Sonera corp Internet services
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6226
Date: 2005-11-05T04:07:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ed Falis wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 21:26:49 -0500, Anonymous Coward  
> <bogus_addy@bogus_domain.net> wrote:
>> In article <slrndmn0ub.v5k.lauri@dev.diter.com>, Lauri Ora wrote:
>>> Some versions of GNAT also has option -gnatR1 (List rep info), which
>>> gives you similar output:
>> That is a very useful option.  I wish I had known about it sooner.  Is
>> there a similar switch for C code?  It would make interface coding so
>> much easier if I could generate this output for C types before
>> constructing the corrosponding ADA interface.
> But if you order the components the same in both languages, and use 
> pragma  Convention (C, ...) on the Ada side, the Ada record layout will 
> match the  C struct layout.

Which types does this work for? Those defined in Interfaces.C?

-Lauri