From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce6f6f23c4e880ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-23 20:17:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!news.xtra.co.nz!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "AG" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3d123f34.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> <3D128BA9.8090707@telepath.com> Subject: Re: Multitasking theory question X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:18:35 +1200 NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.55.167.253 X-Complaints-To: newsadmin@xtra.co.nz X-Trace: news.xtra.co.nz 1024888623 210.55.167.253 (Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:17:03 NZST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:17:03 NZST Organization: Xtra Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26632 Date: 2002-06-24T15:18:35+12:00 List-Id: "Ted Dennison" wrote in message news:3D128BA9.8090707@telepath.com... > Kai Schuelke wrote: > How tasks are implemented is up to the compiler. <<...>> > DOS has no process support of any kind, Win32 supports threads. What does it have to do with DOS or any OS for that matter? Surely, a run-time system can implement whatever scheduling it wants to (within hardware capabilities that is). After all, what is an OS but a glorified run-time system...