From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,88ed72d98e6b3457
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-10 01:10:24 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Stephane Richard" <stephane.richard@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <TdJfb.5879$RU4.57294@newsfep4-glfd.server.ntli.net>
 <3F7F760E.2020901@comcast.net> <3F8035B0.7080902@noplace.com>
 <blpr1v$b2g$1@titan.btinternet.com> <3F816A35.4030108@noplace.com>
 <bls7ji$2u3$1@hercules.btinternet.com> <3F81FBEC.9010103@noplace.com>
 <6Ingb.30667$541.13861@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3F82B4A4.5060301@noplace.com>
 <S1zgb.27851$kD3.22334@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <3F82F527.3020101@noplace.com>
 <blv03f$ko1$1@titan.btinternet.com> <3F836528.9020906@noplace.com>
 <iK%gb.36593$541.21571@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3F8557C1.7090704@noplace.com>
 <O4dhb.34905$yU5.15592@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> <3F86241A.4000409@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Standard Library Interest?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <PPthb.38075$541.19728@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:10:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.44.78.7
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1065773423 129.44.78.7 (Fri,
 10 Oct 2003 04:10:23 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 04:10:23 EDT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:586
Date: 2003-10-10T08:10:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>
> Please don't assign it to the ARG.  The ARG always has much more work
> than they can handle.  Bringing back the URG or some new group would be
> a better idea.
>
>
>
> -- 
>                                                      Robert I. Eachus

IF we go the way of a new group, who would we have to talk to to get things
started, get the big wheel turning?

However I think we should have a basis for a structure to suggest first.  So
on your other post to Martin, when you say to create a structure of names
(atleast) I'd say you're right :-)..if not anything else, a text file that
represents an image of a possible end product perhaps?  That wouldn't be too
long too do.  Atleast we'd all see (and be able to agree on) a given layout.
For that I have to agreewith you :-).

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com