From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00, HK_RANDOM_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,afb4d45672b1e262 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!trnddc06.POSTED!20ae255c!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Justin Gombos Subject: Re: Any way of persuading GNAT/GCC to implement a true overlay and not a pointer? References: User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 01:42:07 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.44.77.228 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: trnddc06 1144633327 129.44.77.228 (Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:42:07 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 21:42:07 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3764 Date: 2006-04-10T01:42:07+00:00 List-Id: On 2006-04-04, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > Expecting unusual requirements to be handled for free on important > projects is just plain silly. The best support is often free. I see no issue with the OP using this forum as a starting point. In fact, it would be beyond silly to start up a support contract for a single issue, risking the possibility that the paid support can't help anyway, when the issue could potentially be answered in a public forum at no cost. The OP came to the right place. If the forum fails to help, he still has the option of buying support. -- PM instructions: do a C4esar Ciph3r on my address; retain punctuation.