From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 114809,b87849933931bc93 X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public From: perryman@benelli.uk.tele.nokia.fi (Steven Perryman) Subject: Re: What is wrong with OO ? Date: 1997/01/06 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 208022842 distribution: world references: <5ahqo6$gk6@news4.digex.net> <5aig7q$din@news.irisa.fr> organization: Nokia Telecommunications, Transmission Product Development, newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng Date: 1997-01-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5aig7q$din@news.irisa.fr> jezequel@stormbringer.irisa.fr (Jean-Marc Jezequel) writes: >> In article <5ahqo6$gk6@news4.digex.net>, ell@access2.digex.net (Ell) writes: >> You only addressed one of my points (MI) and would you please tell me >> which OOPLs had MI before C++. > Eiffel has multiple inheritance, genericity, exception handling, GC etc. > since 1986. The OO Lisp variants had MI in 1986. LOOPS and Flavors come immediately to mind. CLOS may have been defined by then, but certainly was around in 1987 (which means it had MI before C++ ) . Regards, Steven Perryman perryman@cpd.ntc.nokia.com