From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6026bc2dec7a883 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: Claw & Re: ANNOUNCEMENT - GNAT 3.13p availability Date: 2000/08/17 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 659435001 References: <8n962s$42n$1@nnrp1.deja.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com 966537902 24.20.190.201 (Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:45:02 PDT) Organization: @Home Network NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:45:02 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: >It turns out that OpenToken 2.0 and earlier suffer from this same >problem. I'm curious if it really is a gnat bug though. I could see >someone making a case that since the caller's view of the routine in >question is still abstract, only dynamicly dispatching calls are legal. I reported the problem to ACT some months ago and have been assured that they have a fix, which I understand will be in the next Gnat release.