From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,124905131f269735 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-26 07:13:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: gnat and heap size Date: 26 Sep 2001 09:13:45 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1001442590.557811@news.drenet.dnd.ca> <%26s7.4950$ev2.8194@www.newsranger.com> <9oqs5k$jjq$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9osjpt$a5l$1@nh.pace.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1001513627 10703 192.135.80.34 (26 Sep 2001 14:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13397 Date: 2001-09-26T09:13:45-05:00 List-Id: In article <9osjpt$a5l$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, "Marin David Condic" writes: > Must have missed the Solaris 7 part. Sorry. Not too familiar with how that > restricts memory use, but I seem to recall a similar situation quite a while > back in which there was one parameter that could be changed & a system > reboot performed that altered how much memory was available to a process. > > My recollection was that Solaris did not have many memory management > parameters - VMS certainly had considerably more control over process quotas > on all sorts of resources. The latest version of VMS on Alpha has removed the former maximum of 4 pagefiles serving any single process.