From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,255a2533fba89f5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-18 15:17:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn3feed!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Parity using 'Write, was Re: Calculate and set Parity References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1032387438 12.234.13.56 (Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:17:18 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:17:18 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 22:17:18 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29137 Date: 2002-09-18T22:17:18+00:00 List-Id: >I think it would be better to return a type Parity_Kind is (Even, Odd), >rather than a Boolean, or else name the function Odd_Parity (or >Even_Parity), so that True and False have obvious meanings. Agreed. Mea culpa.