From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_SPAM,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fc772,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc772,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-14 02:49:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!usc.edu!rpi!not-for-mail From: Wesley Groleau Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++.moderated Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: 14 Jun 2003 05:51:44 -0400 Organization: Ain't no organization here! Sender: cppmods@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Reply-To: wesgroleau@despammed.com NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:00:43 -0500 X-Submission-Address: c++-submit@netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.lang.c++.moderated iQBVAwUAPurwKUHMCo9UcraBAQFxfQH+JGQvv/znvv+1Jsetvg0v6Vf3LjgNJmHs Lp1Ha9CWZJ+T2DMQjbvKxy+iFXlfx1OcfX75pe5/SHrfFdAEMESxuA== =OWcS Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39159 comp.lang.c++.moderated:68326 Date: 2003-06-14T05:51:44-04:00 List-Id: > programs? For that matter, why would you ever *want* uninitialized I wouldn't, but ... > variables? Another way to ask that is when is initialization a bad When the programmer graduates from deliberately taking advantage of it to taking it for granted. [ Send an empty e-mail to c++-help@netlab.cs.rpi.edu for info ] [ about comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: do this! ]