From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-11 08:50:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@classwide.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <Xns9133DBAF0AD71ralphworkcoza@196.25.240.158>
 <Sjlw7.37140$GT3.4946134@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <3BC30674.BA88AAB6@brighton.ac.uk> <9pvv3t$ves$1@news.huji.ac.il>
 <Bggx7.314$KN5.148429887@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <9q49fc$nh3$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <_gix7.24513$ev2.32605@www.newsranger.com>
 <b9ix7.322$xi.158479523@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
 <13jx7.24593$ev2.33014@www.newsranger.com>
Subject: Re: why not 
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <OQix7.333$hz1.163695682@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.176.121
X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net
X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1002813870 ST000 208.191.176.121 (Thu,
 11 Oct 2001 11:24:30 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:24:30 EDT
Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com
X-UserInfo1: 
 FKPGWWCEJKVOBTT^]BCB^]\@PJ_^PBQLGPQRJRQIMASJETAANVW[AKWZE\]^XQWIGNE_[EBL@^_\^JOCQ^RSNVLGTFTKHTXHHP[NB\_C@\SD@EP_[KCXX__AGDDEKGFNB\ZOKLRNCY_CGG[RHT_UN@C_BSY\G__IJIX_PLSA[CCFAULEY\FL\VLGANTQQ]FN
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:24:30 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14281
Date: 2001-10-11T15:24:30+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Ted Dennison" <dennison@telepath.com> wrote in message
news:13jx7.24593$ev2.33014@www.newsranger.com...
> In article <b9ix7.322$xi.158479523@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com>, Pat Rogers
> says...
> >
> >Can you be more specific?  Which one(s)?  For example I just looked at
the
> >bounded queue package and don't see any.  A quick "grep" shows none for
the
> >bounded components but it was quick-and-dirty.
>
> I had trouble with iterators inside of maps dynamicly creating and
destroying
> objects during an iteration of the map a couple of years ago. I
fixed(hacked) it
> myself for the bounded map I was using and dully submitted my changes to
Simon
> for consideration. Its only a guess that some of the other bounded
structures do
> the same thing, but I know I only looked at (and submitted a fix for) the
> bounded maps.

OK, thanks for the pointer (no pun intended:).

> Personally I don't think I'd trust it again in real-time without a
> careful examination of the source code for all the calls I plan on using
(which
> can get quite hairy, considering we are talking about multilevel generic
> instantiations, with other generics as paramters).

For real-time apps that's good advice for any reusable library.