From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx12.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Shark8 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: is getting OpenGL to work with Ada a lost cause? References: <64ff459f-98c0-4fab-bcdd-d9fafe3311e6@googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 16:46:38 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 10:46:36 -0600 X-Received-Bytes: 1306 X-Received-Body-CRC: 3891957813 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21426 Date: 2014-08-03T10:46:36-06:00 List-Id: On 03-Aug-14 03:54, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > I have no idea why existing Ada bindings are so difficult to make working. Because in order to make a good [thick] Ada binding you have to "strain" all the crap from the gl_enum soup; ideally this would entail the creation of specific enumerations for the various parameters of the various functions but with the addition of subtyping for various near-complete matches on values.