From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 114809,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid114809,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3dbe4f9b1c81e39e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ohk@ultra.tfdt-o.nta.no (Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen FOU.TD/DELAB)
Subject: Re: OO, C++, and something much better!
Date: 1997/01/21
Message-ID: <OHK.97Jan21094448@ultra.tfdt-o.nta.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 211217151
references: <5c1nst$l8o@news3.digex.net>
followup-to: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
organization: Telenor Online Public Access
newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.smalltalk,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.software-eng
Date: 1997-01-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5c1nst$l8o@news3.digex.net> ell@access4.digex.net (Ell) writes:

   Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen FOU.TD/DELAB (ohk@ultra.tfdt-o.nta.no) wrote:
   : Aren't you confusing thes issue of static vs. dynamic typing with the
   : issuse of having an interpreter for the language, including an
   : integrated development environment?

   But doesn't static mean 'compile time' and dynamic imply 'runtime'?  If
   you never compile it is all dynamic.  Right?  :-^}

   [And all of this ignores strong vs. weak typing.]

   Elliott

As there are interpreters for C++, I guess C++ is a dynamically typed
language? And the existence of a Scheme or Lisp compiler means that
they are statically typed?