From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c3d0e99376a4f379 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: To Markus Reply-To: anon@anon.org (anon) References: <1187235764.909133.180650@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:31:10 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.64.180.65 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1187649070 12.64.180.65 (Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:31:10 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:31:10 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:1521 Date: 2007-08-20T22:31:10+00:00 List-Id: YOUR THE TROLL! Since you stated on the 18th that you are not a US citizen (Message-ID: <9ky7g95a11.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>). You probility do not know how the US protect it borders and how the US government uses miss-information to kept the US safe from outsiders. During the "COLD WAR" (mid 1940s to mid 1980s) the DOD and other US government departments put out a lot of miss-information and some of the truth is still classified even today. And because of how the US works on security only a US citizen could find out the truth when the information becomes de-classified. So, unless your are one of the team members that security has been de-classified you should not continue spreading your miss-information. But to be on the team at that time you had to be a US citizen. Note: I only use the miss-information that web sites like en.wikipedia.org or Adaic on history when I need a good laugh! In , development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de (Markus writes: > >'anon AT anon DOT org (anon)' wrote: > >> As for GNAT converting Ada to C. Try looking at a number of papers >> of the net on GNAT Ada and also how to write a Frontend compiler for >> gnu's gcc c compiler. Also, for a direct proof take a look at the C coded >> procedure called 'gigi' in file "trans.c" in GCC-4.x Ada source packages. >> The 'gigi" procedure is called from the procedure "Call_Back_End" in >> file "Back_End.adb". Gnat uses it converts the C (ada tree) tree and >> generates the assembly code and finally the object code. This is the >> structure of all GCC type compilers that use GCC as a backend. And >> there are a number of papers at GNU on this. > > >Does the expression "intermediate representation" or "intermediate >code" convey any meaning to you? > >>>- F2A is not a Fortran preprocessor for using Ada as the back end; you use it >>>once and forget the Fortran code, and continue developing the Ada source. >>>At the end, you have one step. Sorry... >> >> I guess you have never tried to increase a codes performance. To prove >> each step you must start with the original code every time. In the F2A >> that is, the FORTRAN code. And sometime to increase a codes >> performance you may need to alter the FORTRAN code which has some >> documentation and then test it, first. Because for functionally >> both the FORTRAN and Ada codes must yield the correct results. >> Both in performance and output. > >What ist so difficult about "forget"? Forget as in "throw away" ... > >- M