From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b777a2e4fd60559 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsdst01.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!cfe18fef!not-for-mail From: Gary Scott Organization: Home User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Only one Ada vendor? References: <1192806306.892546.73350@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <3178697.p0Bn0lCN4l@linux1.krischik.com> In-Reply-To: <3178697.p0Bn0lCN4l@linux1.krischik.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.94.57.93 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com 1192988014 ST000 68.94.57.93 (Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:33:34 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:33:34 EDT X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCA[S@]RV@[WBHB^WHAAJYFBL@MAHU^_BAMEH]TCDYG^WHKAH_[JTXDX_KI\VB]JBVMS^YT_G[CZVWAOS\DHFWEH]@KGXYHB\_CMDSFABP^J[AHHRKARLE_JDBLJ\XA[JRMEI]MGJSPB\Y]^KG\@S^@VQKI_Q[G@@_ACSARASDEFLBJ]S\GFNTUAVBL Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:33:34 -0500 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2525 Date: 2007-10-21T12:33:34-05:00 List-Id: Martin Krischik wrote: > Sloan.Kohler@gmail.com wrote: > > >>Its Friday - thought I would try to stir things up... >> >>Several people have stated that "Ada" refers to the latest approved >>version (i.e., Ada => "Ada 2005"). Its been well over a year since >>AdaCore announced Ada 2005 support started shipping a pretty complete >>implementation. As far as I know, no other vendor has yet announced >>any intention to support the current standard. Maybe they're working >>on it in secrecy. Maybe they are waiting on customer demand. Maybe >>they have already lost most of their customers to AdaCore and simply >>don't care anymore. > > > The funny thing is: The is only one C and C++ vendor which *fully* supports > C 99 and C++ 2003. Perhaps full standart compliance is out of fashion :-( . Definitely not the case for Fortran. Standard compliance is very high on the list of vendors. It does take a while for the changes to be rolled in though, more so when there are fairly massive changes to the standard. > > Martin > -- Gary Scott mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org -OR- Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done. -- Henry Ford