From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-30 12:17:22 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
Date: 30 May 2003 14:17:20 -0500
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <NzKOkDLvSRDW@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbd6rkk.31i.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <L2MAa.13584$sJ4.6809@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
 <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ED6A852.75AC0133@adaworks.com>
 <3ED74ED3.4020505@noplace.com> <3ed75cc3$1@news.wineasy.se>
 <3ED7779E.930ABCEA@adaworks.com> <mB-cnRBpHp4qCUqjXTWcpQ@gbronline.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054322152 8960 192.135.80.34 (30 May 2003
 19:15:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 19:15:52 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38140
Date: 2003-05-30T14:17:20-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <mB-cnRBpHp4qCUqjXTWcpQ@gbronline.com>, Wesley Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> writes:
> 
>> professors find themselves with little motivation to do work related to
>> Ada.   If such funding were available, I would be happy to encourage more
>> of my own students to pursue more Ada projects, including the development
>> of more libraries.
> 
> Is the Ada Resource Association still a viable group?
> If they are truly interested in the future of Ada, perhaps
> they would look at grant proposals for new Ada annexes
> and award grants to those that seem to be of particular
> value.

I would draw a distinction between viable and wealthy.