From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5fbcb931da30b4c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!news-in-02.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed1.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ISO Rules on upgrading standards Date: 14 Jan 2007 07:05:52 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1168779951 5147 192.135.80.34 (14 Jan 2007 13:05:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8130 Date: 2007-01-14T07:05:52-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Robert Leif" writes: > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > color:black'>Is paragraph (e) above relevant to the w:st=3D"on"> w:st=3D"on">Ada standard? If so, would it permit = > small > annual or biannual additions to w:st=3D"on">Ada?  > I believe that one of the reasons for the lack of market acceptance for = > w:st=3D"on">Ada has been = > the present > 10 year cycle for updating the standard.

There has to be _some_ language available for those who prefer stability to trendiness.