From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Get_Line vs Adasockets
Date: 2000/08/17
Date: 2000-08-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <NoWm5.114130$i5.1653554@news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39979E8D.558CF45A@baesystems.com
>Perhaps one of the language lawyers could comment on the use of
>unchecked_conversion to (I assume) convert from an address to an access type?
It's not required to do what you want, but often does.
>I thought that was the purpose of the standard package
>System.Address_To_Access_Conversions?
Yes. That is supposed to do what you want.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-13 0:00 Get_Line vs Adasockets Ultor
2000-08-13 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
2000-08-17 0:00 ` tmoran [this message]
2000-08-21 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ultor
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Michal Zalewski
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-08-21 1:44 ` David Thompson
2000-08-14 0:00 ` Anders Gidenstam
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox