From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,44b6497e63927028 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-21 05:10:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.nuthinbutnews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Stephane Richard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada] X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:10:21 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.149.82.27 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1066738221 141.149.82.27 (Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:10:21 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:10:21 EDT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1274 Date: 2003-10-21T12:10:21+00:00 List-Id: >Because those things (security etc.) are there in actual implementations >e.g. GLADE? *** so GLADE would be the current opposing force to CORBA then. Good something to read about :-). >But I understand the desire for a kind of standard extension. If it can >be done inside the language (perhaps with ASIS), then it could be a CAL >branch ;-) *** Depending on how GLADE measures up, this could be an excellent idea for CAL. Parts of it anyways :-). >"Keep Ada small, create a big library" could be the internal motto of >the CAL developers. *** Short, to the point, catchy. SOLD :-). -- St�phane Richard "Ada World" Webmaster http://www.adaworld.com "Marius Amado Alves" wrote in message news:mailman.141.1066736164.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org... > (Ada-France PLEASE set Reply-To field!) >