From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc6b98caa14b4851 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.71.34.3!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why is OSS Commercial Software So Expensive? Date: 12 Oct 2006 05:07:36 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3698634.pnVmuSdKQp@linux1.krischik.com> <1160631304.552665.260340@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1160647591 25935 192.135.80.34 (12 Oct 2006 10:06:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:06:31 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6930 Date: 2006-10-12T05:07:36-05:00 List-Id: In article <1160631304.552665.260340@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, "Adrian Hoe" writes: > On Oct 12, 11:17 am, sg wrote: >> Adrian Hoe napisa=B3(a): >> >> >> > well, but what if I want just a compiler without any support and just >> for 3 seats... not for 5, and not with GPL? > > Exactly what we wanted for 3 only but still have to pay for 5. Wish > they can be more flexible. The president of ACT has said that below a certain level it is _more_ expensive for them to support a smaller number of users than a larger number. When one gets to 5 users, there is some self-help provided between people in the customer organization.