From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,87557ce53b069315
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: meaning of "current instance"
Date: 1999/11/12
Message-ID: <NcLW3.1031$dp.46853@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 547591930
References: <382b4885_4@news1.prserv.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 942374829 207.214.211.82 (Thu,
 11 Nov 1999 18:47:09 PST)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 18:47:09 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-11-12T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

 Given
type T is record
  I : Integer := T.I;
  J : Integer := Random(RGen);
A declaration of an object of type T will result in (unbounded)
erroneous execution, but with T.I replaced by T.J it would be OK,
resulting in T.I = T.J, right?