From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7769c087a4d30c0e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:53:10 -0500
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <1120751455.846822.141050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Conversion and task pointer.
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 13:56:18 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800
Message-ID: <NJCdncBrrcmL51DfRVn-vQ@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-JgycqHnIQiL5z5c5NU/5jBghUVN1lne7UIHYJ0uHUmXIao1VowQ7gLLs1oVg/eD2XsQwtvMSOKWirxn!sAoB0M7hTedqWI6A+Gus5ojxsizKGxHjBzbYux+eQxYsGLUsnhYB0C83SSCkKRp90QqhJtEBk/OU
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11944
Date: 2005-07-07T13:56:18-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"e.coli" <maurizio.ferracini@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1120751455.846822.141050@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> look at this exemple:
...
> how work Unchecked_Conversion with task pointer?
> the behavior depend by the compiler?

The Standard make no requirements that this do anything useful. It says that
the result is implementation-defined (which means that it is supposed to be
documented). One allowed result is for the result to be abnormal, which
would allow essentially anything to happen.

What are trying to do? There might be another way to do it (task ids come to
mind).

                         Randy.