From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7fb761492573daee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: cjames@envisionet.net Subject: Re: No top schools use Ada Date: 1995/04/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 101107941 references: content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII organization: ENVISIONET, Inc. mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , writes: > Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada > Path: nsgate.envisionet.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.c om!uwm.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw1.att.com!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail > From: ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist) > Subject: Re: No top schools use Ada > Message-ID: > Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration) > Nntp-Posting-Host: socrates.hr.att.com > Organization: AT&T > References: <3mq0jd$r10@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com> > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 1995 02:55:25 GMT > Lines: 16 > > jmartin@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (Jay M Martin) writes: > > Lets look at which languages the top CS department use for their first > > class: > > According to the full list (summarized by Richard Pattis in comp.edu), > the most widely used language for CS1 is Pascal (36%). Ada is in second > place with 17.5%, C is fifth with 8.6%, and C++ is sixth with 6.5%. The > fact that none of the nine schools listed by Jay Martin use Ada for their > first class is not statisticly significant. > > The use of C, however, is statisticly significant (P <= 0.05, barely). > If one wants to try to read anything into this preference for C, it is > important to keep in mind that the CS departments listed by Jay Martin are > the ones with top ranked *graduate* programs. Graduate program rankings > mainly reflect the quality of the research done at the department. > Kenneth Almquist > Any discussion of statistical significance here is meaningless without stating the number of subjects of interest, ie, the Sample Size.