From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f47e0c6e2e5fd00d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." Subject: Re: Function name problem Date: 2000/01/16 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 573469532 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <85qecu$24r$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <85stib$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-ELN-Date: Sun Jan 16 12:47:41 2000 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 948055661 158.252.122.172 (Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:47:41 PST) Organization: EarthLink Network, Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:47:41 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-01-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: David Starner wrote in message news:85stib$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu... > On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:37:21 +0100, Harald Schmidt wrote: > >in article 85qecu$24r$1@nnrp1.deja.com, Jeff Carter at > >jrcarter001@my-deja.com wrote on 15.01.2000 19:30: > > > it. If I could use Unicode in writing programs, I can see a few places > where mathematical symbols would make nice operators, but still, > a {dot symbol} b and a {cross symbol} b aren't superior enough to > Dot(a,b) and Cross (a, b) to make the precidence and readibility > problems worth it. Beside which, the parameter/return type profiles of dot product and cross product are unique, so you can just use the "*" operator for these.