From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8e0cb57b5e30a8be X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.71.34.3!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Java wrappers around Ada? Date: 22 Mar 2006 07:33:16 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <1143032491.488772.259820@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1143034345 20025 192.135.80.34 (22 Mar 2006 13:32:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3555 Date: 2006-03-22T07:33:16-06:00 List-Id: In article <1143032491.488772.259820@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, kk_oop@yahoo.com writes: > Hi. My team has a bunch of legacy Ada code. Our new code is being > written in Java. However, we still have many complex algorithms > written in thousands of lines of Ada. Rather than rewriting the > tested/validated Ada code in Java, we'd like to create a Java facade > that would delegate to the Ada code, thereby making the Ada code > available to newer Java client objects. Is this reasonable (as opposed > to rewriting everything in Java)? Anyone know what > mechanisms/libraries would support such an approach? Rewriting correct code solely for the purpose of getting it into another language is always fraught with peril. That includes going to Ada.