From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,421baaa91aa096a7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!pit-transit.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Dale Stanbrough Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Wide_[Wide_]Character References: User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.2 (Intel Mac OS X) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:00:05 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.161.16.225 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1215860405 58.161.16.225 (Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:00:05 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 21:00:05 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1127 Date: 2008-07-12T11:00:05+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > RM 3.5.2 talks about "code positions" (=code points, I guess), represented > by Wide_Wide_Character. From this I conclude that it shall be UCS-4 with > some implementation-defined endianness. Code points can be represented by any set of encodings. Wide_Character seems to deliberately confine itself to the BMP, so UCS-2 would suffice (and seems implied). I can't see any implication that would cause me to think Wide_Wide_Character is definitely UCS-4 (and not UTF-16). Dale -- dstanbro@spam.o.matic.bigpond.net.au