From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,751584f55705ddb7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Side-effect arithmetic again [was: Ada ... in embedded systems]
Date: 1996/03/26
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-2603961413450001@mlma21.elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 144334916
references: <RALW.96Mar8113005@vulcan.gecm.com>
 <314B33CE.64EE@escmail.orl.mmc.com> <4i6efq$dd9@dfw.dfw.net>
 <4iif6g$o5o@fred.netinfo.com.au> <4ik5bm$ogg@dayuc.dayton.saic.com>
 <dewar.827181191@schonberg> <EACHUS.96Mar19195517@spectre.mitre.org>
organization: ELCA Matrix SA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <EACHUS.96Mar19195517@spectre.mitre.org>,
eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) wrote:

>    (Should the function form be named something other than Inc and
>Dec?  Does the Ada domain specific knowledge that the parameters of
>a function are not changed dominate here, or should it be named Next?)

I would prefer Succ and Pred for the functions, so we use the same
convention as for attributes.