From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,c890e6ab3fb2c5fc X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c890e6ab3fb2c5fc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-25 12:44:10 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!gw1.att.com!csn!ncar!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!EU.net!chsun!mlma11.matrix.ch!user From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber) Subject: Re: ADA Objects Help! Message-ID: Sender: usenet@eunet.ch Organization: ELCA Matrix SA References: <3f9g1u$j4m@nps.navy.mil> <3fcs59$70s@nps.navy.mil> <3ff186$c19@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3fjk7t$2km@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3frlje$rpr@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 1995 20:44:10 GMT Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.lang.ada:18311 comp.lang.c++:88075 Date: 1995-01-25T20:44:10+00:00 List-Id: In article <3frlje$rpr@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote: > Mats, if you don't see any problems in package types, then you have not even > started to scratch the surface. I don't know if there are any easily > accessible written discussions of this issue or not. The amount of > discussion that has occurred on this issue would certainly fill many books. > It would be helpful to have a summary so that people don't keep rewalking > the same path without knowing where it leads, but I certainly don't have > time to do it! If you have any pointers to litterature on the subject, I am interested. In the meantime, you may want to have a look at my thesis, which contains a fairly complete proposal for OO Ada based on package types. Just drop me a note and I'll send you a PostScript file. Mats