From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9da298537a16487e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-23 08:43:15 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!EU.net!chsun!mlma11.matrix.ch!user
From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Run-time checking and speed
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-2301951743150001@mlma11.matrix.ch>
Sender: usenet@eunet.ch
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
References: <3ev16u$ojc@pong.lasc.lockheed.com>
 <3f0prq$3bq@theopolis.orl.mmc.com>      <3f3deb$4us@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <3fa2pk$kbi@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <EACHUS.95Jan17151835@spectre.mitre.org>
 <3fjhrj$9b3@oahu.cs.ucla.edu> <3fngl9$4iv@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 16:43:15 GMT
Date: 1995-01-23T16:43:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3fngl9$4iv@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) wrote:

> In GNAT, we have introduced an implementation defined pragma Unsuppress
> that undoes a previous suppression, including one applied by command
> line argument, precisely to deal with this kind of situation, so a module
> that REALLY needs checks should contain a pragma Unsuppress.

Very interesting. Can Suppress and Unsuppress be nested ? ;-)

Mats