From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,43f65db68662a705
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-20 12:22:50 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!stern.fokus.gmd.de!ceres.fokus.gmd.de!zib-berlin.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!chsun!mlma11.matrix.ch!user
From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Top 10 Ada myths
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-2003952122500001@mlma11.matrix.ch>
Sender: usenet@eunet.ch
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
References: <51286.pukite@daina.com> <3kc5ig$164a@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
 <EACHUS.95Mar20113605@spectre.mitre.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 1995 20:22:50 GMT
Date: 1995-03-20T20:22:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <EACHUS.95Mar20113605@spectre.mitre.org>,
eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) wrote:

> [...] (Of course, the
> moment anything in this field is "finished," you find errors and bugs.
> But Ada 95 has been much, much better than Ada 83 in this regard [...]

How do you know ? There isn't even a complete compiler around. I think
certain bugs in the Ada 95 definition will only come up as the language
gets implemented.