From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e2fc12ef22d13d95
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-15 08:09:52 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!chsun!mlma11.matrix.ch!user
From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Q: Generic parameter names exported?
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-1503951650470001@mlma11.matrix.ch>
Sender: usenet@eunet.ch
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
References: <3k5a0t$86q@moe.tas.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 15:50:47 GMT
Date: 1995-03-15T15:50:47+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3k5a0t$86q@moe.tas.com>, brettb@tas.com (H Brett Bolen) wrote:

> Item is the 'thing i want to put on the queue.  I thought that
> 'Word32_Queue_Pkg.Item_Type' could be used, but instead I had to
> use 'System_Types.Integer_32'.  I think '..Item_Type' is cleaner.

Yes, this is the Ada 83 rule. In Ada 95, it has (unfortunately) not
changed except for generic formal packages.