From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c86cf2332cbe682
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-13 11:33:28 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!chsun!mlma11.matrix.ch!user
From: Mats.Weber@matrix.ch (Mats Weber)
Subject: Re: Ada.strings.bounded problems?
Message-ID: <Mats.Weber-1301952033280001@mlma11.matrix.ch>
Sender: usenet@eunet.ch
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
References: <TARJEIJ.95Jan11183331@ulrik.uio.no>
 <3f3jlh$kts@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 19:33:28 GMT
Date: 1995-01-13T19:33:28+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3f3jlh$kts@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>, ncohen@watson.ibm.com wrote:

>    [beginning if example deleted]
> 
>    with Bounded_80, Generic_Additional_Bounded_String_Facilities;
>    pragma Elaborate (Generic_Additional_Bounded_String_Facilities);

Is this pragma still necessary in Ada 95 ? I thought some Ada 95 rule
removed its need for the case of generic units.

>    package Additional_Bounded_80_Facilities is
>       new Generic_Additional_Bounded_String_Facilities (Bounded_80);

Mats