From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
From: aho@dial.eunet.ch (Thomas Aho)
Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada?
Date: 1997/04/10
Message-ID: <MPLANET.334d3be0aho989683@news.eunet.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 232258310
References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu>
Organization: EUnet AG
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-04-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I saw an investigation on Rationals site the ohter day, where they
compared C and ADA.

Check out http://www.rational.com

	/Thomas