From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10261c,90121986704b5776
X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c950,90121986704b5776
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c950,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: billg@jk.pst.com
Subject: Re: Your english sucks, mine is better.
Date: 1997/11/23
Message-ID: <MPG.ee29e258b7bed66989783@news.idt.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 292074583
References: <EK3t2I.4tD@research.att.com> <dewar.880302894@merv>
 <MPG.ee2636b141efc8b989781@news.idt.net> <65ab3u$v07$1@news.nyu.edu>
Organization: IDT
Newsgroups: 
 comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.pascal.ansi-iso,comp.lang.pascal.misc
Date: 1997-11-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <65ab3u$v07$1@news.nyu.edu>, kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu says...
> In article <MPG.ee2636b141efc8b989781@news.idt.net> billg@jk.pst.com writes:
> >In article <dewar.880302894@merv>, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu says...
> >> Andy Koenig says
> >> 
> >> <<If I were looking for another job, I would expect any prospective
> >> employer to look in, say, DejaNews to see what I had posted on Usenet
> >> in the past.>>
> >> 
> >> Absolutely, I think this is standard practice at this stage. 
> >> You can often find out quite a lot about peoploe by seeing what they have
> >> said in public!
> >> 
> >Not everyone feels that this medium requires honesty, integrity, ethics etc. 
> 
> Precisely.  That's exactly why such a search is useful.  I, for one,
> would never hire somebody who thought that there was *any* medium or
> forum that did not require honesty, integrity, and ethics.
> 
Well then you don't fall into the category of capitalist either because 
being dishonest and unethical is at the core of capitalistic "success".  
But then you were referring to _other_ people weren't you.  Your 
marketing people (and managers) will inherently be dishonest and 
unethical by definition of the way things really work.  You're still a 
pup.  Or many preach, few practice what they preach.