From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jim.hyslop@leitch.com (Jim Hyslop) Subject: Re: Any research putting c above ada? Date: 1997/04/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 236352490 References: <5ih6i9$oct$1@waldorf.csc.calpoly.edu> <33571eab.15675649@news.airmail.net> Organization: Leitch Technology Int. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , demer@hc17031.hcsd.ca says... > My observation on Ada bindings has been that > a. Ada83 went way farther than any previous languages in supporting > mixed-language programming. (Try connecting software written by > 2 different C compilers...) Piece of cake, compared to connecting software compiled by two different C++ compilers... -- Jim Hyslop jim.hyslop@leitch.com Welcome to the world of Windows 95, where you click on "Start" to shut down.