From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-04 04:06:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!peernews-us.colt.net!newsfeed.news2me.com!yellow.newsread.com!news-toy.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!POSTED.monger.newsread.com!not-for-mail From: Peter C. Chapin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes? Message-ID: References: Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:52:58 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.114.175.195 X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 1075895578 216.114.175.195 (Wed, 04 Feb 2004 06:52:58 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 06:52:58 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5218 Date: 2004-02-04T11:52:58+00:00 List-Id: In article , rosen@adalog.fr says... > Now, this is not the only possible design pattern. For example, you can have the equivalent of "friends" in C++ by declaring two > tagged types in the same package. The previous notation is no more applicable to this pattern. Yes, I see that. Coupling two classes by defining them in the same package provides some interesting options. BTW, the web page you mentioned in your post, http://www.adalog.fr/publica2.htm, doesn't work for me. I get an error about loading the Java applet. Peter