From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-04 04:22:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!POSTED.monger.newsread.com!not-for-mail
From: Peter C. Chapin <pchapin@sover.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes?
Message-ID: <MPG.1a8aa6469b0c8cd3989690@news.sover.net>
References: <MPG.1a89fe0b56e324d998968e@news.sover.net>
 <fK1Ub.87451$U%5.467557@attbi_s03>
Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 11:49:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.114.175.195
X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role <abuse@sover.net>, We Care <abuse@newsread.com>
X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 1075895346 216.114.175.195 (Wed,
 04 Feb 2004 06:49:06 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 06:49:06 EST
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5219
Date: 2004-02-04T11:49:06+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <fK1Ub.87451$U%5.467557@attbi_s03>, tmoran@acm.org says...

> Remember that a package can contain more than one type definition, and
> in general a package is a higher level of abstraction than any one of
> its contents.

Yes, I understand... although in the case where one is trying to build a 
"class" in the sense meant by other object oriented languages, using a 
package to wrap up a single type and its operations also seems to be 
sensible as well. I can see that this is a matter of debate.

> Have you looked at "Ada Quality and Style"?

No, but I will look for it. Thanks!

Peter