From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,dfe340a115a0bc1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-03 22:21:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.octanews.net!newsread.com!newsstand.newsread.com!POSTED.monger.newsread.com!not-for-mail From: Peter C. Chapin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Naming convention for classes? Message-ID: References: Organization: Kelsey Mountain Software X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:31:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.114.160.14 X-Complaints-To: Abuse Role , We Care X-Trace: monger.newsread.com 1075861889 216.114.160.14 (Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:31:29 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:31:29 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5210 Date: 2004-02-04T02:31:29+00:00 List-Id: In article , spam@spam.com says... > Is this a troll? You'll find ample discussion of this (naming types and > packages) if you search c.l.a at groups.google.com. Some people are very > attached to one approach or the other. Okay, so in other words either approach is considered acceptable by the community at large. It's a matter of style. At least that's the impression I get from your reply. Does that sound like a fair assessment? Peter