From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,83a56cb8370ebd04 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-08 11:15:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!7885-cm.able.ES!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat 3.15p bugs (was: ADA vs JAVA sockets) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:14:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 7885-cm.able.es (212.97.178.85) X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1073589302 8839187 212.97.178.85 ([49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4221 Date: 2004-01-08T20:14:50+01:00 List-Id: Duncan Sands dice... > Having > a version in bugs are fixed is better than having a list of bugs IMHO. That is true to a point. If I distribute my program open source I prefer to point people to Gnat 3.15p which is easily available for many platforms than suggesting getting the last CVS and recompile. Perhaps the CVS commits contain annotations on fixed bugs?