From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71d1e36fcaaa9b90 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-12 00:47:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.97.179.223!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Help with anormal pausing of program Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:47:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3EE73D2B.4010502@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.97.179.223 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1055404049 17290039 212.97.179.223 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39034 Date: 2003-06-12T09:47:21+02:00 List-Id: > I see that we are talking about two different problems? The MSKB article > talks about leaps forward, but your test program shows leaps back. In > reality, more that leaps, it seems that some value is mangled because > the incorrect values are usually very small (< 5000) SORRY SORRY SORRY my fault, I was misinterpreting the results of Anisikov's test. I have no backward leaps. Then the patch discussed maybe my solution. -- ------------------------- Jano 402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es -------------------------