From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 11:09:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.97.174.175!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X (Ada.Sockets) Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:09:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <6a90b886.0305262344.1d558079@posting.google.com> <3ED4A94C.2020501@noplace.com> <3ed4c9a2@news.wineasy.se> <3ED4EB4E.6050108@cogeco.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.97.174.175 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054145393 5595967 212.97.174.175 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37928 Date: 2003-05-28T20:09:56+02:00 List-Id: Larry Kilgallen dice... > In article <3ED4EB4E.6050108@cogeco.ca>, "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" writes: > > > I agree that it is probably time for an Ada standard on this ubiquitous > > aspect of "general computing" today. > > Standard, as in required of all compilers ? > > That would be totally bogus in some embedded environments. And as an annex?