From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,URI_HEX autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c22949b5ebf3505f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-08 14:35:34 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!212.97.175.23!not-for-mail From: Jano Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Two sockets questions Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 23:35:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8765omaa6b.fsf@inf.enst.fr> <87wuh1g5wy.fsf@inf.enst.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.97.175.23 X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1052429733 19705731 212.97.175.23 (16 [49872]) X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.50 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37079 Date: 2003-05-08T23:35:21+02:00 List-Id: Samuel Tardieu dice... > >>>>> "Jano" == Jano writes: > > Jano> That's no problem. I have used it before in the Gnat > Jano> binding. However, the Gnat thick binding raises a "Socket_error > Jano> [10035] Operation would block" trying to connect > > On what OS? The correct return code is undoubtly EINPROGRESS, but it > is possible that EINPROGRESS is equal to EWOULDBLOCK on some > platforms. XP here (3.15p) -- ------------------------- Jano 402450.at.cepsz.unizar.es -------------------------